Canon 100-400 f4.5-5.6L USM/IS Review

Canon 100-400mm Lens Retracted

Over the past two weeks, I’ve had the opportunity to shoot with Canon’s 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS/USM zoom lens. This lens had long been of interest to me because of it’s versatile focal length. However, at a time when I was buying lenses, I shied away from this lens because of rumors that it was not sharp at the 400mm focal length. Also, I was not a fan of the push/pull zoom design.

Canon 100-400mm Lens Extended

Years later, I was still curious about the lens so I took advantage of my Canon Professional Services membership and requested an evaluation copy. So after two weeks of use, here are my thoughts on one of Canon’s most popular professional zoom lenses.


  • Image quality. I was very pleased with the quality of images from this lens. It delivered images that were very sharp and contrasty. I have heard rumors of vignetting at the long end of the focal length on full frame bodies, but I kept the lens mounted on a 1.3x crop factor camera so I can not validate those rumors. On a crop factor camera, I did not notice any vignetting.
  • Extremely versatile and popular focal length. This feature has been something that I have longed for in my current setup. With this versatility, it makes a great sports, landscape, bird, and wildlife lens. You could use it for portraits as well but there are much better options for portraits than this lens. Mounted on a 1.3x or 1.6x crop factor camera body, the focal length increases to 130-520 or 160-640mm, respectively. It’s nice not having to keep switching lenses from shorter to longer focal lengths and back again.
  • Image Stabilization. This is both a pro and con, but more of a pro. I used the lens both on a tripod and hand-held and the IS feature simply worked. It’s first generation IS technology though and I’d love to see the newer improved IS system in this lens. Still, better to have some IS than none at all.
  • Compatible with 1.4x and 2.0x extenders. Although this lens is compatible with extenders, I did not use them nor would I except in very unusual circumstances with this lens due to its variable aperture. Autofocus at f8 would be retained on 1-series camera bodies, but only the center focus point would be active. That’s not a big deal as you can focus and recompose. In a pinch, it’s nice that this lens is compatible with extenders but for my shooting style, if I need more focal length, I’ll use the 500mm lens and mount an extender on that if necessary.
  • Fun. With its very versatile focal range and IS technology, this lens is a joy to walk around with.


  • Autofocus. This feature is actually a pro and a con, but as I’ll explain, it’s more of a con in my experience.  On the pro side, when the conditions are right (e.g. good light, high contrast settings), this lens’ autofocus works superbly and delivers. However, in low-light, low-contrast scenes, the lens is extremely slow and often does not focus at all.  On numerous occasions with a rabbit or bird drinking at a pond, the lens did not lock-on and required a manual adjustment by me to get the lens to lock its focus. Sometimes, I lost the shot while manually adjusting. Anyone who shoots wildlife knows that opportunities come and go and the difference between getting a shot and not getting one can come down to seconds.
  • Push-Pull Design.  I still do not like the design though I did get used to it. The lens has an adjustment ring so you can adjust the tension of the push pull feature. I kept it at the smoothest setting so that I could quickly zoom in and out. The bad thing though is it’s located right next to the manual focus ring and can cause you to accidentally turn the tension ring instead of the focus ring when in manual mode. The push pull design contributes to zoom creep unless you adjust the tension ring to a tighter setting, but doing that makes it harder to zoom in and out.


Anytime you write a camera or lens review the ultimate question people ask is whether or not you would add one to your camera bag. I’m still undecided. If I consider the image quality and zoom versatility, I could easily say “Yes.” However, the autofocus issues are enough for me to answer that question with a resounding “No,” at least for now. This is a lens that I desperately wanted to like and there are many things about it that I do find favorable. However, the last thing I need or want is to depress the autofocus button on my camera and have a lens either hunting to acquire focus or not engaging at all. I can’t afford to risk losing a prized image because the lens did not acquire focus fast enough. Before I completely rule the lens out of my camera bag, I am going to ask Canon for another lens to review. It could be that I had a bad copy and I’d like to test another before I make a final decision. Given this one sample though, would I recommend the lens? Well, if you have demanding expectations about autofocus in low light situations, then I would not. If you can live with its deficiencies, the lens does deliver beautiful images and that focal range is extremely versatile so it still may be worth considering. I’ll have a more definitive answer after I review the second copy so keep an eye out for a future update on this lens.

Until then, may the good light be with you… -Kevin

SAMPLE IMAGES (click on images for a high res review).

Brush Country Sunset. Canon 1D MkII, 100-400/L @ 100mm resting on bean bag on hood of vehicle.

Green Jay. Canon 1DMkII, 100-400/L @ 400mm, f5.6. Gitzo tripod.

Mockinbird. Canon 1D MkII, 100-400/L @ 400mm.

Female Cardinal. Canon 1D MkII, 100-400/L @ 400mm.

Green Jay. Canon 1D MkII, 100-400/L @ 360mm.

Whitetail Doe. Canon 1D MkII, 100-400/L, @ 160mm.

Chachalaca. Canon 1D MkII, 100-400/L @ 300mm. A typical scene in which acquiring autofocus was problematic with this lens.

Canon 1D MkII, 100-400/ L @ 320mm. Setting required a manual adjustment to acquire focus. In this light, the lens should have quickly acquired focus.

Green Jays. Canon 1D MkII, 100-400/L @ 330mm.

Cottontail Rabbit. Canon 1D MkII, 100-400/L @ 340mm. Another example where adjusting focus ring manually was necessary to acquire focus.

2 thoughts on “Canon 100-400 f4.5-5.6L USM/IS Review

  1. Great use of a wonderful lens Kev..and a very nice synopsis. I had the pleasure of using a 100-400 on a misty day at my daughter’s soccer games several years back. I have to say it was a buttery, smooth, wonderful experience. I enjoyed reading your comments and seeing your sample images. Great stuff, my friend! Keep up the wonderful work!

  2. Hey Bryce,
    Did you experience any autofocus issues with the lens you used? Canon has sometimes had QC issues so having a bad copy is possible when it comes to the autofocus. I’m sure hoping that is the case as the new 200-400/4 (when it comes out) is not going to be in my budget 😦 but the 100-400 will be. Like I said in my blog, I’ve not ruled the lens out completely but if the next lens I borrow does have the same autofocus issues, then I will. If the autofocus works in all conditions, I’ll add the lens to my bag. Thanks for the post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s